What is the lack of food safety for managers?

At present, government agencies involved in food safety have officially announced 13 of them. The former vice president of China Agricultural University, Jin Jin, said that from the production to the sale of various types of food, to the circulation, the market, and the consumers, the chain of management and the departments responsible for the management of the food are too many. The problem was that there was a problem between the ring and the ring, and in the end who was responsible for it, all departments kicked the ball, and they were unwilling to take responsibility.

In recent years, the relevant departments have investigated and dealt with the problem foods not too small, but also received certain results. However, fake and shoddy foods have not been fundamentally eradicated. Farther away, there have been the recent appearance of lean meat, colored steamed bread and fake potato flour. The issue of food safety has once again become the focus of public opinion and is worrying.

When it comes to food regulation, it seems that there is no shortage of managers and staffing. However, "the oil is not a bad dish," and there will inevitably be a "vacuum zone" for long-term supervision, and the "food is not under our control." To find quality inspections, quality inspections say whether something is harmful to the human body, and health supervision departments are required to explain it; to find industrial and commercial, industrial and commercial, said "For the market in the sale of goods, just whether the product packaging on the plant name of the plant contact telephone, as long as Not three products, they are deemed qualified, and so on. In addition, the multi-headed supervision has different standards because of the different perspectives of various departments, and the conclusions drawn are often inconsistent. For example, the amount of additives is not much, the proportion of lean meat is not large, and how much harm is caused to human health by melamine, and different departments sometimes give different voices to the public.

The regulatory authorities are certainly advantageous, but they also have drawbacks: First, they find that the food safety issue makes people not know which department to report to. The “multiple windows and doors” do not know which department to look for, especially when it comes to food that needs to be tested to be identified. When it comes to departmental interests, it is more difficult to report. Second, accountability is difficult. There is a set of evasive words for problems and the reason is “sufficient”. Few people are responsible for this. Since the responsibility is not clear and it is difficult to do so, food safety will naturally inevitably cause problems.

Food supervision is a systematic project. As long as there is an error, it is easy to give up. If only a slight gap is left, it may be “drilled”. Some people will come to the general level and take responsibility, and the original supervision power will be scattered in various departments. To concentrate, it has become a multi-headed management for centralized management, replacing more than a dozen "guns" with a "cannon," so that the intensity of supervision is even fiercer and fiercer.